COMP338 – Computer Vision – Assignment 1 
 
o This assignment is worth 15% of the total mark for COMP338 
 
o Students will do the assignment individually. 
 
Submission Instructions 
 
o Send all solutions as a single PDF document containing your answers, results, and 
discussion of the results. Attach the source code for the programming problems as 
separate files. (One PDF doc, one source code file {python or Jupyter Notebook 
(Ipython)}) 
 
o Each student will make a single submission to the Canvas system. 
 
o The deadline for this assignment 14/11/2024, 5:00pm 
 
o Penalties for late submission apply in accordance with departmental policy as set 
out in the student handbook, which can be found at 
http://intranet.csc.liv.ac.uk/student/msc-handbook.pdf 
 and the University Code of Practice on Assessment, found at 
https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/media/livacuk/tqsd/code-of-practice-onassessment/code_of_practice_on_assessment.pdf
Task 1. (50 marks) Canny Edge Detection 
 
OpenCV provides a function canny() to get the edge detection result with an image (you can 
use any grey image). Please do the following: 
 
 1. (25 marks) Reimplement the canny operation without using the built-in canny() 
function (with some explanations of the code). 
2. (10 marks) Test and visualize your implementation results. (with different filters, 
different thresholds and others) 
3. (15 marks) Discuss the difference between your implementation, your results 
compared with the OpenCV implementation. (Compare the numerical results and the 
running time and others.) 
 
Note: 
- It is acceptable if the implementations do not match exactly; you will need to analyze 
the differences between your implementation and the Canny method. Including your 
own reflections in the report will result in additional bonus points. However, it is 
mandatory that you reimplement the function based on your understanding. 
 
Task 2. (50 marks) Feature Extraction 
 
In Lecture 11 and Lab 04 - SIFT & Feature Matching, we have discussed the SIFT feature. 
In practice, there are several other feature extraction methods such as SURF or ORB. In this 
task, we will do extra reading, implementation, and compare SIFT vs. SURF vs. ORB. 
 
Papers to read: 
- Bay et al., SURF: Speeded Up Robust Features, ECCV 2006 
- Rublee et al., ORB: An efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF, ICCV 2011. 
 
Good tutorials: 
- https://docs.opencv.org/4.x/df/dd2/tutorial_py_surf_intro.html 
- https://docs.opencv.org/4.x/d1/d89/tutorial_py_orb.html 
 
 1. (20 marks) Read the SURF and ORB papers and tutorials, summarize your 
understanding. Compare the differences among SIFT vs. SURF vs. ORB. 
2. (10 marks) Given two images (victoria.jpg and victoria2.jpg – both available on 
Canvas), call OpenCV functions to extract ORB keypoints. You can use the built-in 
functions from OpenCV. Visualize the detected keypoints. 
3. (20 marks) Given two images (victoria.jpg and victoria2.jpg), extract the descriptors 
using SIFT and ORB. Perform keypoint matching using Brute-Force Matcher. From 
the results, which method do you think perform the best? Justify your answer. 
 Note: 
- You can also choose the images yourself, as long as they are of the same subject taken 
from different perspectives. You may directly use greyscale images. 
- Including your own reflections in the report will result in additional bonus points. 
However, it is mandatory that you reimplement the function based on your 
understanding. 
 
请加QQ：99515681  邮箱：99515681@qq.com   WX：codinghelp